Tag Archives: TV

Mass Media Manipulation Madness

There are so many people who believe everything they see on TV and take it as fact.  This is disturbing because all through history, mass media has almost always been in cahoots with the elite rulers.

People have said to me, well 9/11 couldn’t have been an inside job because someone would have spoken up and the media would expose it.  But would they?  What if people spoke up, but were silenced?  Here are two videos that might help those who don’t see the manipulation to open their eyes to actual reality.

This first one breaks down how propaganda is used and how the public opinion is swayed by the co-opting of supposed independent media organizations:

This second video names several 9/11 witnesses that have been “silenced” because their testimony doesn’t fit the “official” narrative:

The media bias against Ron Paul, how they are brainwashing the ignorant voting population, a clips montage:

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

George Zimmerman is the new Casey Anthony

Its spring.  Time for this years “BIG TRIAL SEASON” to begin.  It seems every year there is corporate media focus on at least one huge overblown trial.  It is always a divisive trial bidding the guilty crowd versus the not-guilty crowd, and the end of the trial is always an upset.  The media always gets behind the guilty verdict, painting the defendant as an evil person with extreme ill will.  Here in America, what the media spouts, soon becomes the mindset of the people.  They painted Casey Anthony as a murdering psychopath, she was found not-guilty and the whole country went ape-shit, only because she had already been tried in the court of “public opinion” which was really just the court of “corporate media brainwashing.”

This year with the whole George Zimmerman shooting Trayvon Martin thing, the media has already gotten well ahead of itself, painting a very disturbing picture for the months of litigation ahead.
First off, in order for the media to get the public “awww” factor, they show a picture of the 17 year old Trayvon from when he looks to be around 12 years of age, maybe younger:

Here is a more recent photo:

That’s right, gold teeth, white tank, turns out this “kid” is 6’3″.  I am just pointing out how the media has twisted this whole situation by showing pictures of a 12 year old instead of showing pictures of a 17 year old where if HE was the one who was doing the shooting he would be tried as an adult.  But they want to pull at all the mothers’ heart strings with a picture of a young boy so as to make the 28 year old George Zimmerman seem like he is a coward and a vicious killer for shooting some cute little 12 year old boy.   HERE is a good article in the UK Daily Mail breaking it all down.

There were also all sorts of shenanigans on the TV networks such as NBC editing the 911 audio tape, making Zimmerman seem like a racist by editing out vital parts of the conversation.  Al Sharpton, who has his own show on MSNBC has taken it upon himself to make this a civil rights issue even though it really has nothing to do with race or the violation of anyone’s rights.  Here is a video of Jesse Jackson sneaking into a prayer that he will not stop his quest for justice until assault weapons are banned:

Jackson is saying that Trayvon is a “martyr.”  Doesn’t a martyr die for a cause?  I am not sure Trayvon had a cause in mind when he was shot.

Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson as well as the “New” Black Panther Party have made this a white vs. black issue.  Saying that George Zimmerman is a cracker and a white devil.  Only problem is, is that Zimmerman is HALF white, HALF hispanic.  Kind of like how Barack Obama is HALF white, and HALF black.  Zimmerman is just as much white as Sharpton and Jackson’s beloved “black” president.  The whole thing about race and this situation is that RACE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT!   Yet, they have organized marches for racial equality, and hoodie awareness(because Trayvon was wearing a black hoodie pulled over his head, making himself seem suspicious to someone who didn’t know him personally), and marches all over the country in the name of “Justice for Trayvon.”  Sharpton and Jackson are race baiting to drive a wedge between the people of this country, in a year where an incumbent “black” president who is shredding the constitution is up against some rich white guy(supposedly, we’ll see, Ron Paul could still win it with Santorum dropping out, the evangelicals will NOT vote Romney).  They are expertly wielding influence over the very ignorant masses in the United States, it is a sad thing to watch unfold.

But no one knows what really happened.  There were neighbors who witnessed the event in question unfold and saw Trayvon on top of Zimmerman, slamming his head into the ground.  The news conveniently leaves those tidbits of information out of the discussion, because it doesn’t fit their narrative of Zimmerman being a cold-blooded-child-killer.   The trial that will ensue over the next few months will be a spectacle.

Since all of this started happening, now the Department of Justice has stepped into the fray, which is a BAD IDEA, not only is it not their jurisdiction to be meddling in a state run investigation, Attorney General Eric “OKC” Holder has PRAISED Al Sharpton for his good work.  Obviously Eric Holder likes the idea of dividing the people so that they can do some gun grabbing and pass some liberty smashing laws.  Hey Holder, I guess it beats staging a false flag terrorist attack, doesn’t it?  Let’s just take a random case of a concerned neighborhood watch confrontation gone wrong and turn it into a “Whites want to kill blacks” situation so that no one is looking at the real criminals, the people who have weaseled their way in to power.  If anyone should be in prison, it should be Eric Holder.

Those who are awake to this information and see the deception in the media and in society, it is our job to wake up the rest of the people, the clock is always ticking, every day the evil forces of the oligarchy take another step towards total control, the fact that I can post this shows they don’t have it quite yet.  Yes, we are surrounded by proles constantly, but the proles can be reached, they can be stirred by information and truth.  Because once you wake up to the cold hard facts of the deception, you don’t lose sight of them and are much tougher to manipulate.

Anyway, if you read this and disagree, I don’t care, you are just being manipulated by the machine and will never realize this sad truth.  The even sadder truth is that I am falling for it just as hard for even bringing it up to begin with.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Public Sacrifices

If I had the time and energy and some sort of unlimited budget, I could research and document hundreds of cases of public sacrifice in the last 20 years or so.  We could talk recent celebrity sacrifices, where celebrities mysteriously die strange coincidental deaths.  Like Whitney Houston’s death about 24 hours before there was going to be a huge tribute to her at the Grammy Awards. Or Andrew Breitbart’s midnight March 1st death, hours before he was set to release a video of Obama in college fraternizing with known Communist terrorists, an event that he had hyped publicly several times previously saying something along the lines of “wait til March 1st.”  I would rather point out a better example of this happening because it doesn’t involve a celebrity.

missing

Aliahna Lemmon, a missing 9 year old girl from Indianapolis,went missing 12/22/2011 and who’s body was found chopped up by a hacksaw after her neighbor confessed to her murder and told the police where the body could be found on 12/27.  Her neighbor, Michael Plumadore, who just happened to be babysitting her and her 2 younger sisters, said that he hit the girl over the head with a brick, enough times to kill her, then chopped up her body and hid parts of it in his freezer and places “around the trailer park.”  He was babysitting the kids because their father was sleeping during the day and had a third shift job and their mother had the flu.  He confessed to this murder after three interrogations after giving two “conflicting” stories. Plumadore initially said that the girl went missing suddenly in the middle of the night. He said he got up, the door was open, and the girl was gone.  OR SO THE STORY GOES….  Here is the FOX NEWS story.

Plumadore looking upset

Now, after doing a bit, I mean 5 seconds, of research, I came across a comment at the bottom of this page.  The story on that page is slightly different than what is on the Fox News page.  The comment at the bottom reads like this:

“Somebodywhoknewthefamilysays:

The grandmother is a nut bag who has been instatutionalized herself she lived years with a man knowing what he was doing to children not to mention her own child but did nothing and when confronted all she could say was she was living in denial and her name is Leanne Lemmon not fricken Amber Story what is thios make believe time”

So, I read this comment, who labels themselves as “Somebodywhoknewthefamily” and I am thinking “Grandmother? Lived with a man? Leanne Lemmon?  AMBER STORY?”  What is this person going on about?  Why does it say so eloquently “is thios make believe time?”  So i put the words “amber story aliahna lemmons” into the search engine of choice and up popped this article written by The Seattle PI.  This article reveals a new twist to the story.   That the man who killed Aliahna was a friend of the family and that he had LIVED with her grandfather and cared for him until he died AND that they were living with him for a week.  Her mother had the flu for a WEEK?  This is a ridiculous story when it is all laid out, the media leaves out a lot of inconvenient facts.

But the story is actually not why I am concerned about this event.   It was the roll out of the story.  Here is an example, this is an article that came out the day before Plumadore confessed to the murder, it is an obvious continuation story or an update on the situation story, note this is CNN Headline News, and this is not the only story in mainstream press on this missing girl at this point, there were several articles that I saw discussing this missing girl throughout the weekend prior to his confession.  So as of that point they did not know that it was going to be a horrific murder story.  OR DID THEY?

Here is why I think this was a public sacrifice:

According to missingkids.com there are 800,000 children that go missing every YEAR.  58,000 are abducted by non-family members.  Also, the murder of an abducted child is a rare event, 100 estimated every YEAR.  So 100 out of 800,000 children a year are murdered by their abductors, that is pretty rare, less than a 1% chance, way less actually.  So what are the chances that a missing child that is found chopped up into tiny bits is the focal point of national attention on all major news outlets PRIOR TO discovering that it is a murder of such horrendous proportions.  I would say ABOUT A MILLION TO ONE.

The girl was killed on December 22, which is the day of the Winter Solstice or Yule.  So I looked that up and found this page with Occult Holidays, it says that December 22 is a day of Illuminati sacrifice, Satanic, Luciferian sacrifice.

So we have a mass roll out of a missing girl story which gets people attached to a character, it gets people concerned, then less than a week later we have a confession and a brutally murdered girl story(which came out on the 27th day, a holy number in the mystery religions, it’s prime and equals 9 in numerology 2+7) and she was murdered on 12/22/2011(also 1+2/2+2/2+0+1+1 = 3/4/4 = 11, so we got 9&11 dundundunnnnnn..) the day of sacrifice.  That’s mostly the paranoia speaking there.  But seriously….

The mass roll out is the kicker for me.  Why would they hype this one missing girl over any of the other roughly 14,000 missing kids each week?  The guy Plumadore could have easily been a part of a satanic cult, a low level minion perhaps, he did go to prison, that kind of stuff is probably readily available to people that have been in prison, you can make connections or deals there. Or he could have been blackmailed to confess to the murder, or he supplied the child, the girl was living with him for an entire week at that point, someone could have either inquired or threatened him if they found out about a seemingly inconsequential poor girl living with him.   Plumadore LIVED with the girl’s grandfather, who was a known child molester, and a prison buddy(and fellow child molester) of the grandfather introduced him to Plumadore, that is why he was living with and taking care of the grandfather a month before and for years prior to the old man dying on 12/3.  So the grandfather could have been a member of the occult as well and brought Plumadore in, the minions are always some sort of child molester(i.e. think of all the priests who molested kids, you think that many just COINCIDENTALLY were doing that?).

The Occult Religions also RUN the media, but that is a different story all together(look up FOX = 666).  Here is another good example of the Occult in the media:

TOP: MSNBC's Morning Joe logo with Orobourous
BOTTOM: The Orobouros, an Illuminati click the pic for info.

They hyped up this missing girl on TV all Christmas weekend, when everyone is watching, so that they could emotionally traumatize the country right after the cheery holidays.  That is the point of the sacrifice, emotional trauma on a mass scale.

Here is a good video to watch if you have an hour or so to watch, it is about a child sacrifice ring in Los Angeles, run by teachers at a school, as told by the Former Head of the FBI in Los Angeles.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

The Portrayal of Men On Television (Reverse Sexism?)

Why is it that every time you see a commercial on television, the man is a dumb, simple minded buffoon and the woman is the super genius know-it-all?   Is it this way in real life?  I don’t consider myself a buffoon; nor do I consider any women in my life super geniuses.

Lets break down how the psychology in advertising works in simple terms:

When you see a middle aged woman promoting a product, that product is being pushed at middle aged women.  When you see a kid playing with a toy on a commercial, that advertisement is obviously targeted at kids.  You don’t see an elderly woman pushing testosterone pills, you see a middle aged, graying man who shows a tiny hint of a mid-life crisis(usually by driving a nice car or waving at women or whatever).

Also, there are complicated ads like toddler toy ads that show a toddler playing with a toy but it always shows a parent smiling and watching.  This is obviously an ad not directed at toddlers but directed at the parent who will obviously go buy the toy in hopes of achieving that smile that they saw the parent on TV display.   Another example being an ad for a nursing home where they show old people having a good time, but that is usually directed towards the middle aged people as well because it always shows the old people in some cutesy environment playing cards and smiling, so those middle-agers think “Oh wow, mom and dad will be so happy in that place(or ARE happy there).”   When in reality they are probably surrounded by screaming dementia sufferers and a bunch of wandering, muttering drugged up zombies.  They also probably BECOME one of those people with all of the prescriptions that are given to the elderly these days, can’t be good on the brain.  Also some boner pill commercials show an old man walking with a spring in his step and it always ends with his wife giving a big smile or saying something like, “I like it too”  or “This is a good change”.  To me that is a commercial aimed at old women, only because a man doesn’t want to admit he has a boner issue.  Its like the toddler toy commercial, the smile is the desired effect.

Twenty-somethings males however are almost always portrayed as goons: Junk food eating, beer guzzling, sexist, fat idiots.  I suppose those ads are targeting an audience, but this is every single ad.  I watched several channels over the course of a week, it was difficult to find a man portrayed as smart, unless it was a prescription drug commercial.  Is this a symptom of society’s intelligence decline caused by an over emphasis on being “manly” by watching sports and drinking beer?  Or is this a case of monkey see, monkey do?  Men see men acting dumb: getting drunk, and getting hyperactive while watching sports on TV, so they do it because that is the perceived socially acceptable norm.

Television programming usually follows the same path as this.  Programming is just that, programming.  They are programming culture, norms.

Every time I see this on television I cringe and/or die a little bit inside.  Most of the men I come in contact with are sports minded, know nothing of current events, politics, history, the arts, sociology or even just critical thinking.  Is this how it has always been?  I can’t imagine so.  Televised professional sports is a recent phenomenon when viewed in contrast to total history and that is when sports really took off was when it was televised.   So can we credit the decline of American intelligence on televised sports?  I suppose it doesn’t help.

If every man on television was an upstanding successful citizen who read books, studied history, invented new ideas AND was physically fit AND always got the hottest women, logically we can conclude that more men would be like that and that hotter women would be attracted to them.  Instead we see borderline chimps hooting and hollering or making dumb moronic decisions, but they ALWAYS have a sexy, big tittied woman hanging around rolling her eyes at them like “what an idiot”, but still obviously his significant other, who has all the answers.

closet genius

How does this affect women?  It has to affect them in some way.  They have to be watching television and see the only smart men portrayed are doctors and the rest of the men portrayed are complete sex driven, selfish, sports minded morons.   When they go out into the “real world”, not the TV world, do they then assume that men all act like that?  We are either genius doctors or goons.  In essence I think it does in fact end up that way.

Think about all of the sitcoms there are and how men are portrayed.   The show “Home Improvement” with Tim Allen, sure he knew about engines and tools and loved football but he was in essence an idiot and his wife was always the genius who figured out the problems.   King of Queens is another good example, the main guy is always the one with the problem, his wife always solves it.   A sitcom like Drew Carey featured a smart main character but he was not sexy, was a huge nerd, and only got some good looking women because he was the main writer of the show I would assume. His male friends, however, were  portrayed as morons, and the woman friend was always smart and solved problems.

Is this reverse sexism gone wild?

I think it is more of a blatant dumbing-down of men.

Think about what they are doing to the women.  The shows that they are the main characters in(sex in the city, friends, kardashians, girls next door, etc.) they are almost always huge sluts.   The over-sexualisation of women.

keep on truckin

Everyone is getting brain-washed, TURN OFF YOUR TV!!!!!!!!

I could go into how doctors are portrayed as smart on TV so that people trust them and will believe and do whatever they say.  A perfect way to implement soft kill drugs and eugenics operations.  Prozac anyone?  Maybe another time.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Is Alex Jones A Disinfo Agent?

I have been avidly listening to the Alex Jones Show every single day.  I don’t think I have missed an episode for months.  I listen to the show via Podcast while I work.  I listen to it for two reasons.

1. I am a genuine fan of the show, it is very gripping, very intense sometimes, and usually way funny.

2. I am waiting for Alex Jones to fuck up.  If he is for real and genuine, he will not fuck up.

I have seen a few videos of him show up at protests and just take over and play a part, he acts very childish and bullheaded.  I didn’t know what to think about those videos they were pieced together clips of the event so its hard to say what incited that kind of behavior out of him.   Let me see if I can find them…. ah here’s one:  Alex Jones R or F?  /////here’s the link if that doesn’t work:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUXkmWZ3pLI&feature=related

also

He is playing a character.  Seems like the people arguing with him are even planted there’s cameras all around.  It seems like they are putting on a show.  But are they?  If Alex Jones is playing a character, then he is doing a damn good job.  He is very consistent on his character.  Like I said, I have listened to his show every single day since the beginning of June.  He isn’t wavering, he is sticking to the story line which is lining up perfectly with current events.   That point alone makes it hard to question him, but is the story line lining up because he is in on it and knows what they are doing.   The elite tell you their plans before they carry anything out(i.e. Mein Kampf or Project For A New American Century), they map it all out for you, Alex Jones could be just a way for them to give you a heads up, to add to the terror of it all.  Or he could exist to stir up rebellion to give the government a reason to clamp down and destroy the “resistance”, aka the “patriots”, aka “the awake.”  Us.

In the world of controlled opposition, you  have to create the enemy.

He could be there though to control opposition to globalism.  Like people didn’t know about globalism/New World Order type stuff until Alex Jones told them, so what they know about it, they heard from him.  One main messenger, plus a small branch of subsidiaries that just repeat the news.  The subsidiaries are easy to spot and the main players are usually very visible, WeAreChange, End The Fedders, Regular guests on AJ’s show, various smaller youtube channels that regurgitate the news, they release real info but never the whole story, they just raise the questions.  When you control the questions you control the answers.

Who controls the questions
controls the answers
Who controls the subjects
controls the knowledge

Its like George Orwell number 2.

When you think of the term controlled opposition, you think left-right paradigm stuff.  Well this could be just a bigger form of that.   These are troubled times.  Makes me think about the whole Ron Paul thing too, Alex Jones and Ron Paul both push gold, same with Gerald Celente (another subsidiary.)   Why would Alex Jones be pushing Ron Paul so hard?  I covered a possible scenario in an earlier post.

This whole situation reminds me of a song by a punk band called The Copyrights called “Shit’s Fucked”:

Shit sucks but what can you do
Around here, it’s just me and you
Shit’s fucked but what can you do, around here

Not a place where I wanna grow old
Two hearts in a town with no soul
Don’t think I wanna tempt fate
In the blood red part of a blue state
Full of corn-fed apathy and false pride
Flat, flat land with nowhere to hide
I’m just glad you’re on my side
I’m so happy you’re on my side

Shit is fucked indeed.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ellen

I have a feeling, a funny feeling, that they gave Ellen Degeneres  a daytime talk show to make lonely housewives question their sexuality.

She looks like a dude, just a really “sexy” dude.  She could be there I suppose to make EVERYONE question their sexuality.  You know, a woman might think “Hey, that Ellen is kind of sexy because she kind of looks like a hot guy, maybe other women are sexy as well.”  A man may think “Hey that Ellen looks kind of like a dude but also I kind of want to do her.”  She defines androgynous.  Even her logo has a phallic taste to it.   Notice the e’s are the testes, the two L’s are the shaft:

Why else would they not capitalize her name in the logo?

I am calling out the obvious brain washing here, that is all.   Honestly I don’t watch her show, I am just noticing the obvious tricks on a surface level.    This is not meant to be an offensive attack on Ellen in any way.  She may not realize what she is a part of… well actually, she probably is well aware of what is happening.

If you look into the plans of the elite, breaking up the family and promoting promiscuity is a good way to divide and conquer society.  It is a good way to distract and sexually confuse anyone, especially someone not awake to the deception and manipulation in the mainstream television media.

A lot of people may get offended by this observation, but seriously, LOOK.  It is just a matter of opening your eyes to the advertising of thoughts and ideas.  That is what they are doing, advertising ideas.  Don’t buy into it, turn off the TV.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
%d bloggers like this: